2004-06-27 This past week the Church celebrated the martyrdoms of St. John Fisher and St. Thomas More...
Please register or log in. Registration is free.
June 27, 2004
This past week the Church celebrated the martyrdoms of St. John Fisher
and St. Thomas More. They died in 1535 to defend the papal primacy and
the indissolubility of marriage. Thomas More, as a lawyer, knew all the
devices of lawyers, which can promote justice or, in craven hands, can
thwart it. Amongst all the terrified and compromised bishops of
England, Fisher was the only one to defend the truth with his own life.
Neither was impractical in their stratagems nor did they
intemperately seek persecution. They paid the price of honesty rather
than await the awful price that a soul eventually pays for compromising
the truth. Our nation confronts a graver challenge today. The Church
and Marriage were the issues then. The issue now is the natural law of
life itself.
The Archbishop of St. Louis, the Most Revered Raymond L.
Burke, is both a bishop and a lawyer, and has a legal competence that
charitably shreds emotional equivocation about abortion. In an article
in the journal “America” (June 21-28,2004) he recalls that the bishops
of the United States six years ago recognized the difficulties in
legislating moral good, but also said that “no appeal to policy,
procedure, majority will or pluralism ever excuses a public official
from defending life to the greatest extent possible.” A correctly
formed conscience cannot be “set in opposition to the moral law or the
magisterium of the church” (Catechism, No.2039).”A politician’s failure
to protect the life of the unborn betrays the public trust.
Canon 915 of the Code of Canon Law stipulates that those who
“obstinately” persevere “in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted
to Holy Communion.” This is not a sanction of excommunication
arbitrarily imposed by a bishop, as some people describe it. The
exclusion is inherent in the nature of the Sacrament itself. In other
words, culpable individuals have, by their own public defiance of the
moral good, excommunicated themselves. A bishop only declares the fact,
and that is done when the contempt for the truth has become a public
scandal. Unlike other moral matters which may involve prudential
interpretation, abortion is a definitive moral evil, and supporting
legislation that protects it constitutes formal cooperation in a
gravely sinful act. This blatantly obtains in the case of Catholic
politicians who support organizations like Planned Parenthood and the
National Abortion Rights Action League.
As in the days of St. John Fisher and St. Thomas More, some
fear that opposing “political correctness” might make the situation
worse. Reminiscent of Fisher’s speech to the Legates of England and
More’s essay on the “Sorrows of Christ” written in prison, Archbishop
Burke writes, “What would be profoundly more sorrowful would be the
failure of a bishop to call a soul to conversion, the failure to
protect the flock from scandal and the failure to safeguard the worthy
reception of Communion.”
Fr. George W. Rutler
